Email to editor
Email to Support
Thuglak Online Store
Cho's Collections


Kathadi Ramamurthi's


Tamil Telefilms
6 VCD/DVD Collections


Bharatanatyam
5 - VCD/DVD Collections


Yoga
8 - VCD/DVD Collections


Carnatic Music - Vocal
25 - VCD/DVD Collections


Devotional
21 - VCD/DVD Collections


Carnatic Music - Instrument
10 - VCD/DVD Collections


Mouli's
6 - VCD/DVD Collections


Crazy's
22 - VCD/DVD Collections


S.Ve.Shekher's
15 - VCD/DVD Collections


Kuchupudi
6 VCD/DVD Collections


Y.Gee.Mahendra's
8 - VCD/DVD Collections


Dummies Drama's
6 - VCD/DVD Collections

What does the future hold for NATO's new chairman?

Category :International Sub Category :Europe
2009-07-31 00:00:00
   Views : 235

Brussels, July 31 (DPA) The last time NATO handed over to a new secretary general, in 2004, the alliance had 19 members, a handful of troops in Afghanistan and a diplomatic hangover from the US-led Iraq war.

When Denmark's former prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, 56, takes over the role Saturday, he will inherit a club which has grown to 28 members, an Afghan mission numbering 64,500 men and diplomatic headaches stretching from Georgia to the Gulf of Aden.

All those factors are set to shape his four-year tenure, as NATO fights its Afghan war, looks for a more predictable relationship with Russia and struggles to agree who should join the alliance next.

Afghanistan is set to dominate Fogh Rasmussen's tenure, as it did that of his predecessor, Dutch former foreign minister Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.

The mission is not only NATO's biggest ever, it is far and away its bloodiest: over 1,000 Western troops have died since the alliance began operations in the 'Graveyard of Empires'.

The bulk of the casualties have been suffered by just a handful of countries whose troops are posted in the war-torn south: the US, Britain, Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark.

The Dutch are expected to pull out of Afghanistan next year, while Canada is debating a 2011 pull-out. Britain's role is also under fire at home after 22 soldiers were killed in action in July alone.

If they go, few other NATO states are likely to replace them. Some, such as the Baltic states, lack the manpower; others, such as France, Germany and Italy, who have the resources, are unwilling to send troops into a combat zone which has already cost so many lives.

That leaves Fogh Rasmussen with the task of shoring up NATO support for the mission, while preventing any repetition of earlier bitter accusations of unfair burden-sharing between members.




Author :Ben Nimmo



Bookmark and Share

Related News

  • Djokovic holds off Monfils for fifth season crown
  • Djokovic holds off Monfils for fifth season crown
  • World leaders commit to future G20, curbing bank bonuses
  • Ban futures trading to stem price rise, says CPI-M
  • Theft of 'What's Your Raashee?' master print scares Gowariker
  • Thousands flee as Pakistan hits militant stronghold
  • Bipasha doesn't like sitting on my bike: John Abraham (Film Snippets)
  • What incursions? Listen to your leaders, Chinese envoy tells media